Tax Field Guide

← Sponsors

Landmark Wildlife Management

Unclaimed68/100 · Mixed evidence

Public-record listing · Austin, TX · https://landmarkwildlife.com

Unclaimed listing. This firm has not registered or claimed this page. Everything here comes from public records and the firm’s own public website, as of 2026-10-17. Claim this listing Claiming lets the firm add information and submit proof, which may raise its score.

What they do

Austin, Texas wildlife-biology firm that writes wildlife management plans, files 1-d-1 open-space applications with county appraisal districts and represents landowners as a registered Property Tax Consultant (site cites Senior Property Tax Consultant certification #3928). BBB lists it as accredited with an A+ rating.

Public-record summary. Category: Agricultural / open-space valuation consulting (S14). Fees: Not published on the pages reviewed (contact for pricing).

Strategies offered

Evidence score

68/100 · Mixed evidence43 of 63 applicable points = 68. Rubric v1.1 (2026-10-17). Retrieved 2026-10-17.

20 points are pending because the item could not be checked from public records. If every pending item were verified, the score could reach up to 100. How this is calculated.

CategoryPoints
Regulatory record (weight 25)8 / 20
Tax-controversy record (weight 20)20 / 20
Litigation & complaints (weight 15)13 / 15
Transparency (weight 15)0 / 4
Substance & verifiability (weight 15)0 / 0
Structure quality (weight 10)2 / 4

Red flags

No red flags (RF1-RF13) were triggered by the public evidence reviewed.

Evidence by item

Each line shows the points awarded, how it was checked and a source link where one exists.

Regulatory record · 8 / 20
ItemPointsStatusEvidence
R1 Registration status verified for firm and soliciting individuals where required (BD/IA/state; insurance producer if relevant)n/aNot applicable A professional consulting service; the state property-tax-consultant registration is the relevant license (not verified in this review).
R2 No SEC/FINRA disciplinary events for the firm (10-yr lookback)8 / 8VERIFIED (nothing found) No SEC/FINRA actions found (no matching registrant; CourtListener RECAP 0 hits). source
R3 No disciplinary events for principals/control persons (10-yr lookback)0 / 6UNVERIFIED Individual-level checks for principals were not performed in this review (principals are not listed on this page).
R4 No state securities-regulator or state AG actions against firm/principals0 / 4UNVERIFIED State securities-regulator / AG actions not checked.
R5 Named licensed professionals (CPA/attorney/EA) in good standing0 / 2UNVERIFIED Licensed-professional good standing needs state CPA board / bar lookups for named individuals; not performed in this pilot.
Tax-controversy record · 20 / 20
ItemPointsStatusEvidence
T1 Strategy is not a listed transaction / transaction of interest and not a current Dirty Dozen theme8 / 8VERIFIED Agricultural and wildlife open-space valuation (Tex. Tax Code ch. 23) is not a listed transaction/TOI. source
T2 No DOJ Tax Division injunctions / IRC ยงยง6700, 6701 promoter cases against firm or principals6 / 6VERIFIED (nothing found) No DOJ promoter case found. source
T3 No adverse Tax Court / appellate opinions involving the sponsor's prior deals4 / 4VERIFIED (nothing found) No Tax Court opinions found. source
T4 Provides clear reportable-transaction disclosure guidance (Form 8886/8918) where applicable2 / 2VERIFIED Strategy is not a listed transaction/TOI, so Form 8886/8918 guidance is N/A-justified (rubric: 2 = clear or N/A-justified). source
Litigation & complaints · 13 / 15
ItemPointsStatusEvidence
L1 No material civil fraud/misrepresentation litigation (firm, principals, affiliates)6 / 6VERIFIED (nothing found) No federal civil case found (CourtListener RECAP 0). State courts not searched. source
L2 Complaint pattern reasonable (BBB, state AG, CFPB where relevant)4 / 4PARTIAL BBB profile: accredited, A+; complaint details not reviewed. source
L3 No bankruptcy/insolvency pattern among principals or affiliates3 / 3VERIFIED (nothing found) No bankruptcy case captioned against the firm found (CourtListener). source
L4 Entities in good standing with Secretary of State; legal entity names match marketing0 / 2UNVERIFIED Secretary of State good-standing not checked: state portals checked use CAPTCHA (e.g., SC businessfilings.sc.gov); not bypassed. Needs a manual lookup or paid registry pull.
Transparency · 0 / 4
ItemPointsStatusEvidence
X1 Fees and total costs published or provided in writing before commitment0 / 4UNVERIFIED Fees are not published on the pages reviewed.
X2 Offering documents available before commitment; Form D on EDGAR where applicablen/aNot applicable A consulting engagement; no offering documents apply.
X3 Names tax counsel / opinion issuer and allows direct verificationn/aNot applicable No tax-opinion product.
X4 Discloses audit/examination and claim history of prior dealsn/aNot applicable Not a transaction sponsor.
Substance & verifiability · 0 / 0
ItemPointsStatusEvidence
V1 Underlying assets independently verifiable (e.g., interconnection agreements, utility records, deeds, dated site evidence)n/aNot applicable No investment asset sold.
V2 Placed-in-service / completion evidence for prior projectsn/aNot applicable Not applicable.
V3 Appraisals by independent credentialed appraisers (not promoter-selected)n/aNot applicable Not applicable.
V4 Pre-tax economic substance: investment case exists apart from tax benefitsn/aNot applicable Not an investment.
Structure quality · 2 / 4
ItemPointsStatusEvidence
Q1 Independent legal opinion (not solely promoter-paid boilerplate)n/aNot applicable Not applicable.
Q2 Tax insurance verified directly with named carrier/broker (policy exists, scope understood)n/aNot applicable No tax insurance is claimed in the materials reviewed.
Q3 Fees reasonable relative to comparable offerings0 / 2UNVERIFIED Needs a written fee comparison set of >=3 comparable offerings; not built in this pilot.
Q4 No guaranteed outcomes, benefit multiples or 'audit-proof' claims2 / 2VERIFIED No guaranteed-outcome language found on the pages reviewed. source

Questions to ask this firm

Complaints

0 complaints under review · 0 substantiated · 0 with a response from the firm.

Complaints are an allegation until a reviewer decides. We show only the category and status, never the complainant’s identity, the description or any documents. Private complaints are counted but not itemized. The firm can respond by claiming this listing.

Report a complaint

Request a correction · Report a complaint