Tax Field Guide

← Sponsors

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Unclaimed72/100 · Good evidence

Public-record listing · US · https://www.fidelitycharitable.org

Unclaimed listing. This firm has not registered or claimed this page. Everything here comes from public records and the firm’s own public website, as of 2026-10-15. Claim this listing Claiming lets the firm add information and submit proof, which may raise its score.

What they do

Largest US donor-advised fund sponsor (public charity). Fees and program guidelines are published. Litigation: Fairbairn v. Fidelity Charitable (N.D. Cal.) - donors' misrepresentation/negligence claims over a stock liquidation; judgment for Fidelity Charitable (Feb. 2021).

Public-record summary. Category: Donor-advised fund (S03). Fees: Published: 0.60%/yr admin fee (or $100 min) + investment pool expenses; no minimum contribution.

Strategies offered

Evidence score

72/100 · Good evidence48 of 67 applicable points = 72. Rubric v1.1 (2026-10-17). Retrieved 2026-10-15.

12 points are pending because the item could not be checked from public records. If every pending item were verified, the score could reach up to 90 (limited by caps or by items that don't apply). How this is calculated.

CategoryPoints
Regulatory record (weight 25)12 / 20
Tax-controversy record (weight 20)16 / 20
Litigation & complaints (weight 15)10 / 15
Transparency (weight 15)8 / 8
Substance & verifiability (weight 15)0 / 0
Structure quality (weight 10)2 / 4

Red flags

No red flags (RF1-RF13) were triggered by the public evidence reviewed.

Evidence by item

Each line shows the points awarded, how it was checked and a source link where one exists.

Regulatory record · 12 / 20
ItemPointsStatusEvidence
R1 Registration status verified for firm and soliciting individuals where required (BD/IA/state; insurance producer if relevant)n/aNot applicable Public-charity DAF sponsor; donor contributions are irrevocable gifts, not securities purchases. (Charitable status itself not re-verified on IRS TEOS in this initial review.)
R2 No SEC/FINRA disciplinary events for the firm (10-yr lookback)8 / 8VERIFIED (nothing found) No SEC/FINRA actions against the charity found. source
R3 No disciplinary events for principals/control persons (10-yr lookback)0 / 6UNVERIFIED Officers/trustees not reviewed (Form 990 not pulled).
R4 No state securities-regulator or state AG actions against firm/principals4 / 4VERIFIED (nothing found) No state AG action found by web search. Not exhaustive.
R5 Named licensed professionals (CPA/attorney/EA) in good standing0 / 2UNVERIFIED Licensed-professional good standing needs state CPA board / bar lookups for named individuals; not performed in this initial review.
Tax-controversy record · 16 / 20
ItemPointsStatusEvidence
T1 Strategy is not a listed transaction / transaction of interest and not a current Dirty Dozen theme4 / 8VERIFIED DAF gifts are not listed, but accepting non-cash assets (private stock, real estate) is adjacent to 2026 Dirty Dozen #9 (non-cash charitable schemes) (rubric: 4). source
T2 No DOJ Tax Division injunctions / IRC ยงยง6700, 6701 promoter cases against firm or principals6 / 6VERIFIED (nothing found) No DOJ promoter case found. source
T3 No adverse Tax Court / appellate opinions involving the sponsor's prior deals4 / 4VERIFIED (nothing found) No adverse Tax Court opinions on its program found. source
T4 Provides clear reportable-transaction disclosure guidance (Form 8886/8918) where applicable2 / 2VERIFIED Strategy is not a listed transaction/TOI, so Form 8886/8918 guidance is N/A-justified (rubric: 2 = clear or N/A-justified). source
Litigation & complaints · 10 / 15
ItemPointsStatusEvidence
L1 No material civil fraud/misrepresentation litigation (firm, principals, affiliates)3 / 6VERIFIED Fairbairn v. Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, No. 3:18-cv-04881 (N.D. Cal.): misrepresentation and negligence claims; judgment for Fidelity Charitable (Feb. 26, 2021). Resolved (rubric: 3). source
L2 Complaint pattern reasonable (BBB, state AG, CFPB where relevant)4 / 4VERIFIED (nothing found) No complaint pattern found (no BBB profile returned by BBB search API). source
L3 No bankruptcy/insolvency pattern among principals or affiliates3 / 3VERIFIED (nothing found) No bankruptcy. source
L4 Entities in good standing with Secretary of State; legal entity names match marketing0 / 2UNVERIFIED Secretary of State good-standing not checked: state portals checked use CAPTCHA (e.g., SC businessfilings.sc.gov); not bypassed. Needs a manual lookup or paid registry pull.
Transparency · 8 / 8
ItemPointsStatusEvidence
X1 Fees and total costs published or provided in writing before commitment4 / 4VERIFIED Admin fee 0.60% of assets or $100 minimum; investment pool expenses published. source
X2 Offering documents available before commitment; Form D on EDGAR where applicable4 / 4VERIFIED Program Guidelines published (Form D not applicable to charitable gifts). source
X3 Names tax counsel / opinion issuer and allows direct verificationn/aNot applicable No tax-opinion product; deduction rules come from the Code (Sec. 170).
X4 Discloses audit/examination and claim history of prior dealsn/aNot applicable Not a transaction sponsor with 'prior deals'.
Substance & verifiability · 0 / 0
ItemPointsStatusEvidence
V1 Underlying assets independently verifiable (e.g., interconnection agreements, utility records, deeds, dated site evidence)n/aNot applicable No investment asset sold to donors.
V2 Placed-in-service / completion evidence for prior projectsn/aNot applicable Not applicable.
V3 Appraisals by independent credentialed appraisers (not promoter-selected)n/aNot applicable Qualified appraisals for non-cash gifts are the donor's obligation (Form 8283).
V4 Pre-tax economic substance: investment case exists apart from tax benefitsn/aNot applicable Charitable gift; no investment return expected.
Structure quality · 2 / 4
ItemPointsStatusEvidence
Q1 Independent legal opinion (not solely promoter-paid boilerplate)n/aNot applicable Not applicable.
Q2 Tax insurance verified directly with named carrier/broker (policy exists, scope understood)n/aNot applicable Not applicable.
Q3 Fees reasonable relative to comparable offerings0 / 2UNVERIFIED Needs a written fee comparison set of >=3 comparable offerings; not built in this initial review.
Q4 No guaranteed outcomes, benefit multiples or 'audit-proof' claims2 / 2VERIFIED No guarantee/eliminate-tax language found in materials reviewed. source

Questions to ask this firm

Complaints

0 complaints under review · 0 substantiated · 0 with a response from the firm.

Complaints are an allegation until a reviewer decides. We show only the category and status, never the complainant’s identity, the description or any documents. Private complaints are counted but not itemized. The firm can respond by claiming this listing.

Report a complaint

Request a correction · Report a complaint